Showing posts with label Marriage Ban Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marriage Ban Amendment. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

ICYMI: NC Legislative Leaders Urges US Supreme court to Hear Marriage Amendment Defense

Click here to read story,

“We’ve said all along North Carolina voters deserve to have their voices heard, and this important issue won’t ever be settled until a final decision is made by the U.S. Supreme Court,” said Senate Leader Phil Berger (R-Rockingham).  “Today’s petition is the most efficient and cost-effective way to reach a final resolution.”

“Regardless of where you stand on the ultimate issue, it is important to protect the will of the North Carolina voters who overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment,” said House Speaker-Designee Tim Moore (R-Cleveland).

2015 Session of the NCGA

images (2)

What will the 2015 Session of the NCGA hold for the LGBT Community? That is what many in the community is wondering today. Will the NCGA try to block marriage equality once again?

Tuesday, August 5, 2014

Have you Heard what Tami Fitzgerald said recently?

tamfitz_0Listen to what she has to say about Gay people who wants to married their partners.

 

Click here to listen

(Exec. Director of the North Carolina Values Coalition)

Monday, July 28, 2014

Dr. Creech's Statement on Va. Marriage Amendment Ruling (who isn't happy at all)

PRESS RELEASE

DATE: July 28, 2014

TO: Media outlets

FROM: Dr. Mark Creech, Christian Action League of North Carolina, Inc.

Re: Court's Ruling Declares Virginia's Marriage Amendment
Unconstitutional

The decision today by the three-judge-panel of the 4th Circuit Court
of Appeals declaring Virginia's state constitutional marriage
amendment as unconstitutional is disheartening, but not entirely
unexpected. We've seen this trend by federal courts in more than 20
legal decisions on marriage around the country.

Nevertheless, regardless of how many times such rulings come down from
the courts, they are fundamentally flawed and the worst form of
judicial activism. Judge Henry F. Floyd wrote in the 4th Circuit's
opinion today that Virginia's marriage amendment impermissibly
infringes on a same-sex couple's fundamental right to marry.

Granted, the 14th Amendment protects the fundamental right to marry.
Still, the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions that establish a fundamental
right to marriage have always understood the institution as only the
union of one man and one woman. The debate about marriage has never
really been about who can marry, but what actually defines marriage.
What justices like these of the 4th Circuit Court have done in ruling
against state constitutional marriage amendments is to supply their
own, new answer to the central legal question of how marriage is to be
defined. Of course, the only way they can do this is to impose a view
of marriage, which sees it as a genderless institution and then
pronounces from on high that states must define marriage as the court
declares it.

The point here is the courts, more specifically; in this case the 4th
Circuit Court's three-judge panel has set themselves above the people,
above the Constitution, and above Almighty God - the final authority
who says marriage is and always legitimately shall be between one man
and one woman.

Because North Carolina is a part of the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals,
the ruling damages North Carolina's own constitutional amendment to
protect marriage. There are at least three different lawsuits against
North Carolina's state marriage amendment waiting in the wings. After
the 4th Circuit's decision today, North Carolina Attorney General, Roy
Cooper announced he would not oppose these challenges to overturn
North Carolina's marriage laws. Cooper said, "After reviewing the
Fourth Circuit decision, and consulting with attorneys here, I've
concluded that the state of North Carolina will acknowledge the Fourth
Circuit opinion that marriage is a fundamental right, and that our
office believes that the judges in North Carolina are bound by the
Fourth Circuit decision."

Cooper's decision is premature, surrenders to judicial activism, and
abandons the will of the people of North Carolina. Even though Cooper
has spoken out against our state's marriage amendment, he promised
that he would defend it. He now says that he will not. In fact, he
says North Carolina will recognize the Fourth Circuit Court's decision
and that the state's judges are bound by it. Like the 4th Circuit's
decision, Cooper's own decision is not entirely unexpected, although
no less reprehensible.

In Virginia, Fifty-seven percent of its citizens said via the ballot
box they believed marriage should be legally defined exclusively as
one man and one woman. In North Carolina the margin was even higher,
sixty-one percent. But now two federal justices have overturned the
will of the people and ruled marriage must be defined differently in
all states under the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.

All Americans should tremble. If the courts can redefine the bed-rock
institution of marriage, they can redefine anything. A government of
the people, by the people, and for the people is disappearing, while a
government of the courts, by the courts, and for the courts, is
raising its tyrannical head to write it's will for all of us.

Rev. Mark Creech is executive director of the Raleigh-based Christian
Action League of North Carolina, Inc. He can be reached at
919.787.0606 or office@christianactionleague.org

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Decision day in Durham via ENC

Equality NC (@equalitync)
RSVP today for #4thcircuit #DecisionDay in #Durham – and join the fight for #Equality: http://t.co/R9gYocxoOg
Forwarded via UberSocial



Friday, May 2, 2014

The Case Against 8

Towleroad (@tlrd)
'The Case Against 8' Proposition 8 Documentary Gets a Full Trailer: VIDEO tlrd.us/PX7T7Y pic.twitter.com/EfU7g6pI5o


Sent from my iPhone

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Watch Rep. Bachmann and Others Speak Against DOMA Ruling

Worth watching for every moment of bitter, bitter, delicious tears. Louie Gohmert, Vicki Hartlzer, John Fleming, AND Crazy Eyes. ENJOY!

Statement by the President on the Supreme Court Ruling on the Defense of Marriage Act

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

June 26, 2013

I applaud the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act.  This was discrimination enshrined in law.  It treated loving, committed gay and lesbian couples as a separate and lesser class of people.  The Supreme Court has righted that wrong, and our country is better off for it.  We are a people who declared that we are all created equal – and the love we commit to one another must be equal as well. 

This ruling is a victory for couples who have long fought for equal treatment under the law; for children whose parents’ marriages will now be recognized, rightly, as legitimate; for families that, at long last, will get the respect and protection they deserve; and for friends and supporters who have wanted nothing more than to see their loved ones treated fairly and have worked hard to persuade their nation to change for the better. 

So we welcome today’s decision, and I’ve directed the Attorney General to work with other members of my Cabinet to review all relevant federal statutes to ensure this decision, including its implications for Federal benefits and obligations, is implemented swiftly and smoothly.

On an issue as sensitive as this, knowing that Americans hold a wide range of views based on deeply held beliefs, maintaining our nation’s commitment to religious freedom is also vital.  How religious institutions define and consecrate marriage has always been up to those institutions.  Nothing about this decision – which applies only to civil marriages – changes that.  

The laws of our land are catching up to the fundamental truth that millions of Americans hold in our hearts:  when all Americans are treated as equal, no matter who they are or whom they love, we are all more free. 

###

Monday, April 1, 2013

Hey, Sue even Straight folks get married to Benefits too

The GOP Chairwoman of Georgia Sue Everhart told the Marietta Journal that some people would pretend to be Gay for marriage Benefits.

Sorry to tell Sue Str8 folks have been doing this for long time.

This is what she had to say on the matter,

sue e.

"You may be as straight as an arrow, and you may have a friend that is as straight as an arrow. Say you had a great job with the government where you had this wonderful health plan. I mean, what would prohibit you from saying that you’re gay, and y’all get married and still live as separate, but you get all the benefits? I just see so much abuse in this it’s unreal. I believe a husband and a wife should be a man and a woman, the benefits should be for a man and a woman. There is no way that this is about equality. To me, it’s all about a free ride."

Who does she blame for all these people who get paid to marry someone for a another country, so they can get a green card??

Thursday, March 28, 2013

Kay Hagan finally supports Same Sex Marriage, WOW

From Under the Dome,

U.S. Sen. Kay Hagan said Wednesday that she supported the right of gay people to marry, saying “we should not tell people who they can love or who they can marry.''

Hagan announced her support as the US Supreme Court heard arguments on the issue.

“I know there are strong feelings on both sides, and I have a great deal of respect for their opinions,” Hagan said in an interview. “But after much thought and prayer on my part this is where I am today.''

This change only came after this piece on the Huff,

HuffPo slams the 10 Dem Senators who refuse to back gay marriage_2013-03-27

 

So Hagan gets slams on the Huff for not supporting SSM, then she comes out in support of, done like a true Politician..

Monday, March 11, 2013

Light the Way to Justice | Vigil Events around NC

  • Tuesday, March 26, 2013

  • 7:00pm until 8:00pm

    • As the Supreme Court judges the fate of DOMA and Prop 8, join us for as we call for full LGBT equality.
      Vigils will be taking place across the country as the nation's highest court hears oral arguments in the Prop 8 and DOMA cases on March 26 and 27.
      SAVE THE DATE | LOCATION TBA (IN DOWNTOWN RALEIGH)
      Equality NC is honored to host the March 26th vigil led by community leaders Tracy Hollister and Madeline Goss.
      The event will involve:
      * Featured speakers
      * Candlelight vigil
      * Live tweeting other state & national events. #Light2Justice
      More vigils are being planned across the state and country as a growing coalition of organizations and communities stand together for full equality, including events hosted by Equality NC and Campaign for Southern Equality. Join one near you:
      Asheville
      http://www.facebook.com/events/521879764529059/
      Charlotte
      http://www.facebook.com/events/442505179167652/
      Fayetteville
      http://www.facebook.com/events/617322361616643/
      Greensboro
      http://www.facebook.com/events/232926090178575/
      Raleigh
      http://www.facebook.com/events/148817618616571/
      Want to plan your own event? For more information visit, http://www.lighttojustice.org/

    • Friday, March 8, 2013

      Bill Clinton Flip Flop on DOMA

      clintondoma-300x300Yes, after signing this bill into law 17 years, he now say it tell for it to be over turn. Has he seen the light at the end of his political tunnel, one can only hope.

      ”When I signed the bill, I included a statement with the admonition that “enactment of this legislation should not, despite the fierce and at times divisive rhetoric surrounding it, be understood to provide an excuse for discrimination.” Reading those words today, I know now that, even worse than providing an excuse for discrimination, the law is itself discriminatory. It should be overturned.

      We are still a young country, and many of our landmark civil rights decisions are fresh enough that the voices of their champions still echo, even as the world that preceded them becomes less and less familiar. We have yet to celebrate the centennial of the 19th Amendment, but a society that denied women the vote would seem to us now not unusual or old-fashioned but alien. I believe that in 2013 DOMA and opposition to marriage equality are vestiges of just such an unfamiliar society.

      Americans have been at this sort of a crossroads often enough to recognize the right path. We understand that, while our laws may at times lag behind our best natures, in the end they catch up to our core values. One hundred fifty years ago, in the midst of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln concluded a message to Congress by posing the very question we face today: “It is not ‘Can any of us imagine better?’ but ‘Can we all do better?’?”

      The answer is of course and always yes. In that spirit, I join with the Obama administration, the petitioner Edith Windsor, and the many other dedicated men and women who have engaged in this struggle for decades in urging the Supreme Court to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act.”

      Saturday, January 19, 2013

      Well I guess, there a few Goproud jerks who would like to Marry..

      Statement of GOProud Board of Directors

      (Washington, D.C.) – On Saturday January 12th, the GOProud Board of Directors met in Washington, D.C. and adopted the following resolution regarding the issue of marriage and relationship recognition:

      GOPROUD ON MARRIAGE AND RELATIONSHIP RECOGNITION

      Since our founding, GOProud has worked exclusively on federal issues. Because marriage has been a state issue since the founding of our country, we have had no official position on marriage or relationship recognition. We have supported, and continue to support, the repeal of DOMA, and we oppose any effort to federalize marriage through a constitutional amendment.

      Now that GOProud's Board of Directors has voted to begin work on the state and local level, we believe it is important to lay out our principles when it comes to marriage and relationship recognition.

      GOProud believes that stable, loving, committed relationships are the cornerstone of our society and should be protected and encouraged for all couples - including gay and lesbian couples. We believe that the decision about how to best do this is one that should be made at the state level and that these decisions are best made by the people directly or through their elected representatives - not by unelected judges.

      Where civil marriage is possible, we support civil marriage. Where civil unions are possible, we support civil unions. Where domestic partner benefits are possible, we support domestic partner benefits. As federalists, we do not believe in a one-size-fits-all approach on almost any issue and that includes relationship recognition for gay couples.

      We are firmly committed to winning hearts and minds, which is why we understand that not everyone who doesn't support marriage for gay couples is automatically a bigot or homophobe. We understand that there are people of deep faith who may have religious objections to marriage. We respect those differences and believe that no church or religious institution should ever be forced to solemnize a marriage that is against its teachings.

      Please support our efforts to build a grassroots organization at the state and local levels.  Follow this link to make a contribution today!

      Paid for by GOProud, Inc.

      Tuesday, January 15, 2013

      Country going Bankrupt, yet they find money to Fight DOMA.

      the story at Think Progress:

      ap_john_boehner_ll_121220_wgLate Monday, House Democrats learned that the Republican leadership had once again secretly renegotiated its contract with attorney Paul Clement to defend the anti-gay Defense of Marriage Act at the Supreme Court. This is the third time the contract has been adjusted, raising total costs to $3 million from the original $500,000 cap. Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD) both sit on the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG), the House body intervening to defend DOMA in court in lieu of the Department of Justice’s decision not to. However, they did not find out about BLAG’s new agreement with Clement until after it had already been finalized.

      Wednesday, November 14, 2012

      Supreme Court Pushes Back DOMA & Prop 8 Cases By Ten Days

      An update from AFER:

      AFER just received word from the U.S. Supreme Court that it will discuss whether to hear AFER’s federal constitutional challenge to California’s Proposition 8 at its private Conference on Friday, November 30. The Court will also consider on that date whether it will hear one or more challenges to the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). Both the Prop. 8 case and the DOMA cases had previously been distributed for discussion at the Justices’ November 20 Conference.
      The updated timeline suggests that we will likely find out if our case will be heard by the nation’s highest court, or if marriages can resume in California, by Monday, December 3. However, there is no deadline by which the Court must act, and the Justices could hold the case for consideration at a future Conference.

      Thursday, November 8, 2012

      Brian Brown still Claim Americans are still in Favor of one man and one woman marriage.

      430706_10151076462101594_214290641_nNational Organization for Marriage is having a very bad week. The anti-marriage equality organization poured funds and resources into all four states with same-sex marriage ballot measures - and lost every one fucking one of them.

      "Our opponents and some in the media will attempt to portray the election results as a changing point in how Americans view gay marriage, but that is not the case. Americans remain strongly in favor of marriage as the union of one man and one woman." - Brian Brown, president of the National Organization for Marriage.

      Its time to face the music Brian.. Gay Marriage is now and its growing.. while groups like your are dying..  Don’t leave mad, JUST LEAVE.

      Thursday, October 18, 2012

      DOMA Unconstitutional

      Via press release from the ACLU:

      A federal appeals court ruled today that the so-called “Defense of Marriage Act” (DOMA) unconstitutionally discriminates against married same-sex couples. In striking down DOMA, the court held that government discrimination against lesbians and gay men now is assumed to be unconstitutional and that DOMA’s defenders could not offer any good reason for treating married same-sex couples differently from all other married couples. This is the first federal appeals court decision to decide that government discrimination against gay people gets a more exacting level of judicial review, known as “heightened scrutiny.”
      The law had been challenged by Edith “Edie” Windsor, who sued the federal government for failing to recognize her marriage to her partner Thea Spyer, after Spyer’s death in 2009. Windsor and Spyer, who were a couple for 44 years, were married in Canada in 2007, and were considered married by their home state of New York. “This law violated the fundamental American principle of fairness that we all cherish,” said Windsor. “I know Thea would have been so proud to see how far we have come in our fight to be treated with dignity.”
      In her lawsuit, Windsor argued that DOMA violates the equal protection guarantee of the U.S. Constitution because it requires the government to treat same-sex couples who are legally married as strangers. Windsor's lawsuit was filed by the law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, the American Civil Liberties Union and the New York Civil Liberties Union.
      Key passage from the ruling: "In this case, all four factors justify heightened scrutiny: A) homosexuals as a group have historically endured persecution and discrimination; B) homosexuality has no relation to aptitude or ability to contribute to society; C) homosexuals are a discernible group with non-obvious distinguishing characteristics, especially in the subset of those who enter same-sex marriages; and D) the class remains a politically weakened minority."
      Yet another domino falls! View the ruling here or below.
      Windsor 2d Cir Opinion PDF Windsor 2d Cir Opinion PDF

      Monday, October 1, 2012

      NOM is Pissed. they must release records

      Today the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from a national anti-gay marriage group that tried to thwart Maine’s campaign disclosure law requiring it to release its donor list.

      The high court on Monday turned aside an appeal from the National Organization for Marriage, which donated $1.9 million to a political action committee that helped repeal Maine’s same-sex marriage law. Maine’s campaign disclosure law requires groups that raise or spend more than $5,000 to influence elections to register and disclose their donors. The group says that it believes that releasing the donor list would stymie free speech, but the lower court refused to throw out the law.

      Ok, Brian and Maggie where are those records.. Release them Now, since you have no more courts to run to..

      Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...